Showing posts with label Socrates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socrates. Show all posts

Monday, January 11, 2016

LAST DAYS OF SOCRATES




A review of G.M. A. Grube's translation of Plato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates with John M. Copper revising (circa 390 BC, my copy 2000)

(Rating 4 of 5)


The Trial and Death of Socrates is a collection of works by Plato on Socrates that gives a narrative of Socrates's trial and execution.  Socrates had been going around Athens committing the horrible crimes of saying things that other people don’t like.  Unfortunately for Socrates, those “other people” were the ones who held power in Athens. That really is the long and short of it.  

            Socrates was living in a time where people believed in multiple gods that intervened in peoples’ lives.  Not believing in the gods had consequences, such as floods and plagues.  Socrates going around telling people to think for themselves meant people might question the existence of gods or worship new gods that were not of Athens.  Therefore Socrates was a threat to their safety and had to go. 

Death of Socrates by Jacques-Louis David
           Socrates, who chose not to escape his impending doom because of his own philosophy of obedience toward law (although also being past seventy might have made him a little more accepting of the end), became a martyr for free thought and expression.  Of course all of his work and sacrifice could have been lost considering Socrates never wrote anything down.  Fortunately his old pupil, Plato, would be sure to give witness with his writings to Socrates and his ideas.  In this respect we can say that Plato was just as, if not more, important. 

            On the technical side I found having the footnotes at the bottom of the page instead of the end of the book to be more effective in dealing with the text.  I didn’t have to keep going back to check the footnotes.  

Sunday, January 10, 2016

PLATO’S REPUBLIC



A review of Allan Bloom’s translation of The Republic of Plato (360 B.C. original, 1967 translation, 1991 my copy)

(Rating 3 of 5)


I have to be honest, I rated this higher than I wanted because of what a historic book it is and its impact of Western Civilization.  Yet I still rated low enough to cause myself some embarrassment.  I try to remind myself that I am rating a translation as much as the original work, but I must confess I find philosophy to be such a bore that the whole thing was a chore for me to get through.  I now understand while most college courses only have you read parts of it. Yes, there is that nice part about the cave and Socrates's thoughts on types of governments, however I found most of it to be just a rambling conversation that I often found hard to follow. 

            Allan Bloom has a good but long essay at the end that goes on for over a hundred pages.  My only suggestion would have been to break the essay up into ten parts and feature them at the front of each of ten books that make up The Republic.  That would have made it easier to follow. Not only would it allow the reader a better way to pace themselves but it also would enable them to focus on the important parts of each book.  

            When I was done I found myself thinking of the old Mark Twain quote, “A classic is a book that everyone wishes to have read but no one wants to read.”